<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellipoop.com/Topics/science/space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellipoop.com</link>
	<description>Get the latest poop...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intellipoop.com/the-ultimate-astronomy-picture-cache/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellipoop.com/the-ultimate-astronomy-picture-cache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellipoop.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a few years, I&#8217;ve been following a picture site that is managed by NASA. It&#8217;s been a source of contemplation for me, as well as a great archive of information. There&#8217;s a new picture every day, and the list goes back to June 16 1995. You could spend hours on this if you like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Easy AdSense V2.64 -->
<!-- Post[count: 3] -->
<div class="ezAdsense adsense adsense-leadin" style="float:right;margin:12px;" ><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1362247816575301";
/* 336x280, created 7/19/09 */
google_ad_slot = "4208531415";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html"><img class="alignleft" src="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/apod.gif" alt="logo" width="89" height="74" /></a><strong><span style="color: #000000;">For a few years, I&#8217;ve been following a picture site that is managed by NASA. It&#8217;s been a source of contemplation for me, as well as a great archive of information. There&#8217;s a new picture every day, and the list goes back to <strong>June 16 1995. You could spend hours on this if you like to study astronomy. There are many pictures of distant galaxies and stars, along with lots of other stuff related to our planet&#8217;s position in the universe. Go to the </strong></span><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html" target="_blank">Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive</a> for some of the best pictures of outer space that you will ever see! If you like science, you don&#8217;t want to miss out on this one.<br />
</strong></p>
<div class="su-linkbox" id="post-94-linkbox"><div class="su-linkbox-label">Link to this post!</div><div class="su-linkbox-field"><input type="text" value="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellipoop.com/the-ultimate-astronomy-picture-cache/&quot;&gt;The ultimate astronomy picture cache&lt;/a&gt;" onclick="javascript:this.select()" readonly="readonly" style="width: 100%;" /></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellipoop.com/the-ultimate-astronomy-picture-cache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intellipoop.com/an-interesting-observation-on-extra-terrestrial-encounter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellipoop.com/an-interesting-observation-on-extra-terrestrial-encounter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellipoop.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The METI Controversy&#8221;: Should Detection by an Exo Civilization Be Viewed as a Threat? If we should pick up signals from alien civilizations, Stephen Hawking, our century&#8217;s Einstein, warns: &#8220;we should have be wary of answering back, until we have evolved&#8221; a bit further. Meeting a more advanced civilization, at our present stage,&#8217; Hawking says [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header"><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/07/the-meti-controversy-revisited-is-detection-by-an-exo-civilization-a-threat-a-galaxy-insight.html">&#8220;The METI Controversy&#8221;: Should Detection by an Exo Civilization Be Viewed as a Threat? </a></h3>
<div class="entry-body"><a style="display: inline;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011571f94069970b-pi"><img class="at-xid-6a00d8341bf7f753ef011571f94069970b alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" title="Headnews_4" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011571f94069970b-800wi" border="0" alt="Headnews_4" width="403" height="203" /></a></p>
<p><em>If we should pick up signals from alien civilizations, Stephen Hawking, our century&#8217;s Einstein, warns: &#8220;we should have be wary of answering back, until we have evolved&#8221; a bit further. Meeting a more advanced civilization, at our present stage,&#8217; Hawking says &#8220;might be a bit like the original inhabitants of America meeting Columbus. I don&#8217;t think they were better off for it.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Mankind has always been driven by contradictory drives.  The relentless curiosity that pushes us forward and is directly responsible for our progress from caves to  cities.  The fear of change that tells us &#8220;hang on, these caves/cities are really nice, we don&#8217;t want to risk losing them.&#8221;  There isn&#8217;t any greater potential threat to the status quo than the discovery of extraterrestrial life, which is why some people would prefer we didn&#8217;t try.</p></div>
<p>There has been some outrage recently over attempts to contact intelligent aliens, where instead of hiding in the corner and listening real hard some astronomers beamed intense directional messages up up and away.  Critics decried these actions as dangerous, though their fears reveal more about us than any eventual ETs.  They assume that they would be similar to humanity, so their first response to finding a more primitive culture would be to exploit the hell out of it.<span id="more-90"></span> While such a fate might be pleasingly ironic (for anyone who isn&#8217;t human, at least), others contend that any species that can make the journey here has advanced to a point where their goals are rather higher-minded than &#8220;Shoot us&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dr Alexander Zaitzev, of the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics at the Russian Academy of Sciences, doesn&#8217;t think much of these worries either way.  A proponent of METI (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence), in a recent paper he shows that the odds of one of the METI messages being detected is a millionth of that due to powerful radar pulses regularly used in astronomical investigation.  Though whether writing a paper saying &#8220;This METI thing we&#8217;re doing has only a tiny chance of working&#8221; is overall a good idea remains to be seen.  An important point is that METI represents an intentional will to make contact, rather than the accidental alien interception of some random radiation from Earth &#8211; the difference between saying &#8220;Hello!&#8221; and just being a suspicious strange noise late at night.</p>
<p>Most of the objections to contacting aliens are weak under close examination.  We can&#8217;t suddenly decide to hide after fifty years of pumping electromagnetic radiation into space without rhyme or reason &#8211; in fact, we&#8217;d better hope that an advanced civilization doesn&#8217;t catch an episode of &#8220;American Idol&#8221; and just vaporize us outright.  Suddenly keeping quiet would be like a drunk boyfriend carefully taking off his shoes after knocking over a bookshelf on his way to the bedroom.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the assumption that aliens would have the same kind of technology we do &#8211; despite the extremely obvious fact that our technology can&#8217;t actually get to other exo planets.  Any attempt to mask radio emissions will likely look like cavemen closing their eyes to hide from satellite imaging.</p>
<p>The simple fact is that certain people have always opposed progress while other, better people have driven it.  &#8220;Experts&#8221; decried boiled water as unhealthy compared the vital stuff straight from the river, cursed antibiotics as a temporary placebo, and confidently declared that computers were nothing but expensive toys.  As an intelligent species we must make every effort to contact anyone (or thing) we can.</p>
<p>Edited and Reposted for commentary by Luke McKinney.</p>
<p>Related Galaxy posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/07/stephen-hawking-the-planet-has-entered-a-new-phase-of-evolution.html">Stephen Hawking: Why Isn&#8217;t the Milky Way &#8220;Crawling With Self-Designing Mechanical or Biological Life?&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/07/stephen-hawking-the-planet-has-entered-a-new-phase-of-evolution.html">Stephen Hawking: &#8220;Humans Have Entered a New Stage of Evolution&#8221;</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/06/the-neo-code-hotspots-most-at-risk-of-an-asteroid-impact.html">Stephen Hawking: &#8220;Asteroid Impacts Biggest Threat to Intelligent Life in the Galaxy&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Related Galaxy posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/05/the-10000-year-explosion-has-human-civilization-accelerated-our-evolution.html">The 10,000 Year Explosion: Has Human Civilization Turbo Charged Evolution?</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/05/homo-sapiens--t.html">Homo Sapiens -The &#8220;Time Travelers&#8221; -A Galaxy Classic</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/scientists-disc.html">“Hyper-Speed” Evolution Discovered</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/12/why-are-evoluti.html">Bringing Ancient Human Viruses Back to Life: A Jurassic Park or Salvation?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/105-0664659-4323656?initialSearch=1&amp;url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keywords=Loren+Eiseley+&amp;Go.x=9&amp;Go.y=13&amp;Go=Go">Immense Journey</a></p>
<p>Source: http://www.rationalvedanta.net/node/131</p>
<div class="su-linkbox" id="post-90-linkbox"><div class="su-linkbox-label">Link to this post!</div><div class="su-linkbox-field"><input type="text" value="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellipoop.com/an-interesting-observation-on-extra-terrestrial-encounter/&quot;&gt;An interesting observation on extra-terrestrial encounter&lt;/a&gt;" onclick="javascript:this.select()" readonly="readonly" style="width: 100%;" /></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellipoop.com/an-interesting-observation-on-extra-terrestrial-encounter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intellipoop.com/microsoft-vs-google-space-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellipoop.com/microsoft-vs-google-space-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telescopes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellipoop.com/2009/07/microsoft-vs-google-space-race/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft vs Google Space Race. Place Your Bets Now! from The Daily Galaxy: Great Discoveries Channel by Casey Kazan Daily Galaxy Editorial Staff Are Microsoft and Google in a space race? We think they are. Their rivalry is also, we believe, a precursor to the next great post-Internet technology boom: space exploration and development. Microsoft  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-title"><a class="entry-title-link" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TheDailyGalaxyNewsFromPlanetEarthBeyond/%7E3/Mg5bb6EVmAQ/your-pick-who-will-win-the-new-space-race-microsoft-or-google.html" target="_blank">Microsoft vs Google Space Race. Place Your Bets Now!</a></h2>
<div class="entry-author"><span class="entry-source-title-parent">from <a class="entry-source-title" href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed/http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheDailyGalaxyNewsFromPlanetEarthBeyond" target="_blank">The Daily Galaxy: Great Discoveries Channel</a></span> by <span class="entry-author-name">Casey Kazan Daily Galaxy Editorial Staff</span></div>
<div>
<p><a style="display: inline;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011572039e51970b-500wi" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011572039e51970b-500wi" alt="Worldwide_telescope_1" width="500" height="429" /></a></p>
<p>Are Microsoft and Google in a space race? We think they are. Their rivalry is also, we believe, a precursor to the next great post-Internet technology boom: space exploration and development.</p>
<div>
<p>Microsoft  released its new Worldwide Telescope this spring, which will access images from NASA&#8217;s great fleet of space-born telescopes and earth-bound observatories such as the future Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, partially funded by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, which is projected for ‘first light’ in 2014 in Chile&#8217;s Atacama Desert -the world&#8217;s Southern Hemisphere space-observatory mecca. The 8.4-meter telescope will be able to survey the entire visible sky deeply in multiple colors every week with its 3-billion pixel digital camera. The telescope will probe the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy, and it will open a movie-like window on objects that change or move rapidly: exploding supernovae, potentially hazardous near-Earth asteroids and distant Kuiper Belt objects.</p>
<p>LSST is truly an Internet telescope, which will put terabytes of data each night into the hands of anyone that wants to <span id="more-86"></span>explore it. The 8.4-metre LSST telescope and the 3-gigapixel camera are thus a shared resource for all humanity — the ultimate network peripheral device to explore the universe.</p>
<p><a style="float: left;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef01156f28b785970c-pi" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef01156f28b785970c-320wi" alt="Darkenergy" /></a> Not to be outdone, Google early this spring joined MIT scientists who are designing a satellite-based observatory -the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS)- that they say could for the first time provide a sensitive survey of the entire sky to search for earth-like planets outside the solar system that appear to cross in front of bright stars. Google will fund development of the wide-field digital cameras needed for the satellite.</p>
<p>&#8220;When starships transporting colonists first depart the solar system, they may well be headed toward a TESS-discovered planet as their new home,&#8221; says George R. Ricker, senior research scientist at the Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research at MIT.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s new free software application called WorldWide Telescope allows everyone from space novices to astronomy professionals to easily explore galaxies, star systems and distant planets.</p>
<p><a style="float: left;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011572039f11970b-pi" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef011572039f11970b-320wi" alt="Wwt_tour" /></a> The WorldWide Telescope links together 12 terabytes &#8212; the data equivalent of 2.6 billion pages of text &#8212; of pictures from sources including the Hubble Space Telescope, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory Center and the Spitzer Space Telescope.</p>
<p>The experience is similar to playing a video game, allowing users to zoom in and out of galaxies that are thousands of light years away. It allows seamless viewing of far-away star systems and rarely-seen space dust in breathtaking clarity.</p>
<p>Microsoft said it will release the WorldWide Telescope free of charge as a tribute to Jim Gray, a Microsoft researcher who went missing off the coast of California while sailing last year. Gray worked on projects with astronomers to organize the vast amounts of data and images being pulled from satellites.</p>
<p>Google has a similar offering called Google Sky, a companion to its Google Earth program.</p>
<p>Features of WorldWide Telescope include virtual tours of different parts of space, led by expert educators and astronomers. People will be able to use the Microsoft program to create their own space tours, to share with their friends. The program is also notable for its high level of detail, its large volume of data and the ability to fine-tune the views, said Curtis Wong, principal researcher in Microsoft&#8217;s Next Media Research Group.</p>
<p>&#8220;I expect that there are going to be a lot of people learning so much more about the sky, because we&#8217;ve taken away the limitations of light pollution and smog and bad weather,&#8221; Wong said. &#8220;Those of us in Seattle, it&#8217;s our chance to finally see the sky.&#8221;</p>
<p>The program runs on the PC desktop but pulls data and images from the Internet. Google Sky can run in a standard Web browser or in the downloadable Google Earth program. But the system requirements for Microsoft&#8217;s WorldWide Telescope program come with a catch: It works only in Windows XP or Windows Vista.</p>
<p>A test version of the software is available for download at http://www.worldwidetelescope.org.</p>
<p>Posted by Casey Kazan.</p>
<p>Related Galaxy posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/06/seti-observator.html" target="_blank">Chile&#8217;s Atacama Desert -World&#8217;s Space-Observatory Mecca<br />
New SETI Observatory Created by Microsoft Co-founder</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/12/mit-others-ask.html" target="_blank">MIT Asks: How Would Extraterrestrial Astronomers Study Earth?</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/09/the-hubble-effe.html" target="_blank">The &#8220;Hubble Effect&#8221; -A Galaxy Insight</a><br />
<a href="http://http//www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/10/harvard-scienti.html" target="_blank">Harvard-Smithsonian Scientists Zero In On Key Sign of Habitable Worlds<br />
</a><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/05/dead_zones_in_t.html" target="_blank">Cruising the Goldilocks Zone -The Search for Super Earths<br />
</a><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/07/gaia--mapping-t.html" target="_blank">GAIA -Mapping the Family Tree of the Milky Way</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/01/daily_video_cla_2.html" target="_blank">The &#8220;Hubble Effect&#8221; -A Galaxy Insight<br />
</a><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/08/eyes-on-the-cos.html" target="_blank">Eyes on the Cosmos -European Space Agency&#8217;s Hawk 1 &amp; Hubble&#8217;s Successor</a></p>
<p>Source Links:</p>
<p>Microsoft WorldWide Telescope: worldwidetelescope.org/<br />
Google Sky: google.com/sky/</p>
<p>http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/362804_msfttelescope13.html</p></div>
</div>
<div class="su-linkbox" id="post-86-linkbox"><div class="su-linkbox-label">Link to this post!</div><div class="su-linkbox-field"><input type="text" value="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellipoop.com/microsoft-vs-google-space-race/&quot;&gt;Microsoft vs Google Space Race&lt;/a&gt;" onclick="javascript:this.select()" readonly="readonly" style="width: 100%;" /></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellipoop.com/microsoft-vs-google-space-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intellipoop.com/82/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellipoop.com/82/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellipoop.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was the Speed of Light Faster in the Early Universe? from The Daily Galaxy: Great Discoveries Channel by Casey Kazan Daily Galaxy Editorial Staff A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo  asks the heretical question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not constant? Magueijo, a 40-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-title"><a class="entry-title-link" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TheDailyGalaxyNewsFromPlanetEarthBeyond/%7E3/3wHZRbR-EXA/was-the-speed-of-light-faster-in-the-early-universe-new-theory-says-yes.html" target="_blank">Was the Speed of Light Faster in the Early Universe?</a></h2>
<div class="entry-author"><span class="entry-source-title-parent">from <a class="entry-source-title" href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed/http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheDailyGalaxyNewsFromPlanetEarthBeyond" target="_blank">The Daily Galaxy: Great Discoveries Channel</a></span> by <span class="entry-author-name">Casey Kazan Daily Galaxy Editorial Staff</span></div>
<div>
<p><a style="display: inline;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef0115710efef4970c-pi" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef0115710efef4970c-500wi" alt="6a00d8341bf7f753ef01156fa47136970c-800wi" align="left" /></a>A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo  asks the heretical question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not constant?</p>
<p>Magueijo, a 40-year old native of Portugal, puts forth the heretical idea that in the very early days of the universe light traveled faster—an idea that if proven could dethrone Einstein and forever change our understanding of the universe. He is a pioneer of the varying speed of light (VSL) theory of cosmology -an alternative to the more mainstream theory of cosmic inflation- which proposes that the speed of light in the early universe was<span id="more-82"></span> of 60 orders of magnitude faster than its present value.</p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/09/vsl.jpg" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;" title="Vsl" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/images/2008/04/09/vsl.jpg" border="0" alt="Vsl" width="312" height="205" /></a> Solving the most intractable problems of cosmology in one brilliant leap, Magueijo’s varying-speed-of-light theory (VSL) would have stunning implications for space travel, black holes, time dilation, and string theory—and could help uncover the grand unified theory that ultimately eluded Einstein.</p>
<p>Joao Magueijo&#8217;s radical ideas intend to turn that Einsteinian dogma on its head. Marueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster than light.</p>
<p>Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space dependent.</p>
<p>In his fist book, <em>Faster than the Speed of Light</em>, Magueijo leads laymen readers into the abstract realm of theoretical physics, based on several well known, as well as obscure, thinkers. The VSL model was first proposed by John Moffat, a Canadian scientist, in 1992. Magueijo carefully builds the foundations for a discussion of Big Bang cosmology, and then segues into the second half of the book, which is devoted to VSL theory.</p>
<p>Like most radical, potentially seminal thinkers,  Magueijo shakes the foundations of the physics community, while irritating off many of his fellow scientists. VSL purposes to solve the problems at which all cosmologists are forever scratching: those inscrutable conceptual puzzles that surround the Big Bang. Currently many of these problems have no widely accepted solutions.</p>
<p>Could Einstein be wrong and Magueijo right? Is he a gadfly or a true, seminal genius? Time will tell.</p>
<p>Posted by Casey Kazan.</p>
<p>Related Galaxy posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/11/einsteins-bigge.html" target="_blank">Einstein’s “Biggest Blunder” May Turn Out to Be His Greatest Success<br />
</a><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/06/einstein-right-.html" target="_blank">Einstein Right (Again): Earth Proven to Bend the Space-Time Fabric</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/07/italian-scienti.html" target="_blank">Italian Scientists Build World’s First “Atomic Laser” Envisioned by Einstein in 1925</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/06/cosmic-jackpot-.html" target="_blank">Cosmic &#8220;X&#8221; or God? -Religion vs Science<br />
</a><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/03/einsteins_big_i.html" target="_blank">Einstein&#8217;s Big Idea -The Cosmic Engine that Drives the Universe</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/08/has-warp-speed-.html" target="_blank">&#8220;Star Trek&#8221; Warp Speeds a Reality? Scientists Claim Quantum Tunneling Exceeds Speed of Light</a></div>
</div>
<div class="su-linkbox" id="post-82-linkbox"><div class="su-linkbox-label">Link to this post!</div><div class="su-linkbox-field"><input type="text" value="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellipoop.com/82/&quot;&gt;Speed of light&lt;/a&gt;" onclick="javascript:this.select()" readonly="readonly" style="width: 100%;" /></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellipoop.com/82/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space | Intellipoop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intellipoop.com/were-probably-not-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellipoop.com/were-probably-not-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michio Kaku]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellipoop.com/2009/07/were-probably-not-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michio Kaku&#8217;s Civilizations of the Cosmos &#8220;What does it mean for a civilization to be a million years old? We have had radio telescopes and spaceships for a few decades; our technical civilization is a few hundred years old &#8230; an advanced civilization millions of years old is as much beyond us as we are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header"><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/11/harnessing-gala.html">Michio Kaku&#8217;s Civilizations of the Cosmos</a></h3>
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/06/tma1_tycho_3.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;" title="Tma1_tycho_3" src="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/images/2007/11/06/tma1_tycho_3.jpg" border="0" alt="Tma1_tycho_3" width="336" height="215" /></a> <em>&#8220;What does it mean for a civilization to be a million years old? We have had radio telescopes and spaceships for a few decades; our technical civilization is a few hundred years old &#8230; an advanced civilization millions of years old is as much beyond us as we are beyond a bushbaby or a macaque.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Carl Sagan<em> </em></div>
<div class="entry-more">
<p>Michio Kaku, professor of theoretical physics at City University of New York, in the current issue of Cosmos writes that Sagan&#8217;s question is no longer just a matter of idle speculation.</p>
<blockquote><p>Soon, humanity may face an existential shock as we discover Earth-sized twins of our planet orbiting nearby solar systems. This may usher in a new era in our relationship with the universe, so that we will never see the night sky in the same way. Realizing that scientists may eventually compile an encyclopedia identifying the precise coordinates of perhaps hundreds of Earth-like planets, gazing at the night sky, we will forever after wonder if someone is gazing back at us.</p></blockquote>
<p>Kaku takes up where some/one of the world&#8217;s pioneer astronomers left off with a definition of civilizations in the universe that mimics the work of <span id="more-65"></span>Russian astrophysicist Kardashev. Inspired at the age of five by a Moscow Planetariumshow about Giordano Bruno,  Kardashev definined three levels of advanced civilizations based on how they harness energy to fuel their societies. All three categories of civilizations, even the most advanced Type 111, would still be bound by the laws of physics thatallow us to predict the behavior of the universe from the subatomic world to the large-scale structure of the universe, through a staggering 43 orders of magnitude (a factor of 10 million billion billion billion billion).</p>
<p>Type 1 civilizations would have a technological level similar to ours at present, as measured by total energy consumption. Carl Sagan estimated that Earth qualifies as a Type 0.7 civilisation.Type 11 civilizations would be capable of harnessing the energy of their own star -constructing, for example, a Dyson Sphere. And Type 111 civilizations would be able to utilize energy on the scale of their own galaxies. Kardeschev and Kaku believe there is an extremely low probability of detecting Type 1 civilizations and suggests that type 11 or 111 civilizations would make better targets.Kardeschev calculated that the energy consumption of these three types of civilizations would be separated by a factor of about 10 billion.</p>
<p>In 1963 Kardeschev searched for traces of the more advanced type 11 and 111 at the 920 MHz wavelength creating an uproar of excitement thinking he had discover signals from a Type 11 civilization that later proved to be an ordinary quasar with a large redshift. A similar uproar occurred in 1967 when regular signals were detected by radio telescopes at Cambridge, England, which turned out to be the first discovery of neutron stars.</p>
<p>Over the next few years, according to Kaku, &#8220;New spaceborne telescopes will finally become powerful enough to identify twins of Earth. The Kepler telescope, to be launched in 2008, will probably be able to identify terrestrial planets – rocky worlds rather than gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn. Until 2012 it will scan as many as 100,000 Sun-like stars up to 2,000 light years away, and perhaps identify hundreds of Earth-like worlds by detecting the slight loss of light they cause as they pass in front of their mother star. Kepler will hopefully identify 185 such planets with less than 1.3 times the radius of Earth, and as many as 640 terrestrial planets less than 2.2 times.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Terrestrial Planet Finder, expected to be launched in about 2014, will scan the brightest 1,000 stars within 50 light years of Earth, and focus on the 50 to 100 brightest planetary systems, analyzing the faint light reflected from these planets to determine if they can support the organic chemistry that make life possible.</p>
<p>All this, Kaku predicts &#8220;will stimulate an active effort to discover if any of them harbor life, perhaps some with civilizations more advanced than ours. According to the laws of planetary evolution, any advanced civilization must grow in energy consumption faster than the frequency of life-threatening catastrophes, such as meteor impacts, ice ages, or supernova explosions. If their growth rate stays any slower, they are doomed to extinction. Thus, this places mathematical lower limits on the growth rates of these civilizations.</p>
<p>Kaku believes along Princeton physicist Freeman Dyson, that although human civilization has only recently begun to master planetary energies -fossil fuels, passive solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear fission, and may one day soon crack nuclear fusion-hat, within a century or two, we should attain Type I status. In fact, growing at a modest rate of 1 per cent per year, Kardashev estimated that it would take only 3,200 years to reach Type II status, and 5,800 years to reach Type III status.</p>
<p>By definition, Kaku proposes that an advanced civilization must grow faster than the frequency of life-threatening catastrophes. Since large meteor and comet impacts take place once every few thousand to million years, a Type I civilization must master space travel to deflect space debris within that time, which should not be much of a problem. Ice ages may take place on a time scale of tens of thousands of years, and so a Type I civilization must learn to modify the weather within that period.</p>
<p>Artificial and internal catastrophes must also be negotiated. Global pollution is a mortal threat for a Type 0 civilization, but not a Type I civilization, which has lived for several millennia as a global force and necessarily achieved ecological balance with its home planet. Internal problems such as wars do present a serious recurring threat, but emerging civilizations have thousands of years in which to solve their racial, national, and sectarian conflicts. Since it would take centuries or even millennia for a Type I civilization to terraform nearby planets, its peoples will have plenty of time to work out their internal differences on the same planet before they finally leave the mother planet in any significant numbers.</p>
<p>The only serious threat to a Type II civilization would be a nearby supernova explosion, whose sudden eruption could scorch their planet in a withering blast of life-destroying gamma-rays. The most potentially interesting civilization is a Type III civilization, &#8220;for it is truly immortal. It has exhausted the power of a single star, and has reached out to other star systems. No natural catastrophe known to science has the capacity to destroy a Type III civilization.&#8221;</p>
<p>Faced with an exploding supernova, a Type 111 would have several alternatives, for example altering the evolution of a dying red giant star which is about to explode, or leaving this particular star system and terraforming a nearby planetary system. Kaka continues:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>However, there are roadblocks to an emerging Type III civilization. Eventually, it bumps into Einstein&#8217;s theory of relativity. Nothing can travel faster than light, which is about 300,000km a second (for a possible loophole, see the end of this article). Since the universe is so vast and space is so empty, this absolute speed limit tends to hold back a civilization&#8217;s successful expansion. Dyson estimates that this roadblock may delay the transition from a Type II to a Type III civilization by perhaps a million years or more.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what is the most efficient way of exploring the hundreds of billions of stars in the galaxy?</p>
<p>Kaku writes that the solution is to to send fleets of &#8216;von Neumann probes&#8217; throughout the galaxy (named after John von Neumann, the Hungarian-born mathematician who defined the mathematical laws of self-replicating systems).</p>
<blockquote><p>A von Neumann probe is a robot designed to reach distant star systems and create factories that will reproduce copies of themselves by the thousands. For von Neumann probes, a planet is a less ideal destination than a dead moon; these have no atmosphere and no erosion, which means the probes can easily land and take off and can &#8216;live off the land&#8217;, using naturally occurring deposits of iron, nickel and other minerals to build replicants for dispersal in search for other star systems.</p>
<p>Arizona State University physicist Paul Davies, has even raised the possibility that a von Neumann probe could be resting on our own Moon, left over from a previous visitation in our system aeons ago -the plot foundation of the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Originally, apparently, Stanley Kubrick began the film with a series of scientists explaining how von Neumann-like probes would be the most efficient method of exploring space. Unfortunately, at the last minute, Kubrick cut the opening segment from his film, and the famous monoliths – von Neumann probes – became mystical entities that triggered human evolution.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>The irony of a search for a Type III civilization is that they probably wouldn&#8217;t resemble anything we&#8217;d be able to recognise immediately.</p>
<p>Kaku concludes that that &#8220;one day, many of us could gaze at the encyclopadia that contains the coordinates of perhaps hundreds of Earth-like planets in our sector of the galaxy. Then we will ponder with wonder, as Sagan did, what an intelligent civilization a millions years ahead of ours will look like.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read Kaku&#8217;s brilliant essay in its entirety at <a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1683">Cosmos Magazine</a>.</p>
<p>Posted by Casey Kazan.</p></div>
</div>
<div class="su-linkbox" id="post-65-linkbox"><div class="su-linkbox-label">Link to this post!</div><div class="su-linkbox-field"><input type="text" value="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellipoop.com/were-probably-not-alone/&quot;&gt;We&#8217;re probably not alone.&lt;/a&gt;" onclick="javascript:this.select()" readonly="readonly" style="width: 100%;" /></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellipoop.com/were-probably-not-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
